Flume

Culture & communication · the half that keeps people

Counting people
is not keeping them.

Attendance and payroll tell you who is here. Recognition, pulse surveys and a knowledge base people actually read are what make them stay — and on a factory floor they have to work without an inbox.

Recognition · this weekpoints to the recipient
HA

Hana recognised Karim — covered a double on the press line

+40
MO

Mostafa recognised Line 3 — zero defects for a full week

+25
SA

Salma recognised Youssef — trained two new starters

+30
73%pulse participation · week 36

Anonymous and still useful

Hide who said it without losing what it tells you.

Anonymity usually costs you the ability to act: if you never record who answered, you cannot stop double-voting and you cannot tell which team is unhappy. Flip the read layer below and watch the names go while the department signal stays.

Survey read layer

Line 34
QA9
Maintenance6
Line 35
QA8
Line 33

Identity is recorded either way. Anonymity is applied when results are read, not by failing to store who answered.

Line 3 · 3 replies4
Maintenance · 1 replies6
QA · 2 replies8.5
one reply per personenforced
Still answerableLine 3 at 4Segmentation survives anonymity — which is the whole point. A table with no identity in it could not enforce one-reply-per-person or tell you which team to go and talk to.

Redaction happens in one place, at the read layer, so an anonymous survey and an attributed one share the same storage and the same guarantees.

What ships

Ten capabilities for the workforce that does not sit at a desk.

01

Peer recognition

Anyone can recognise anyone, with a message and points credited to the person receiving it.

02

Rewards catalog

An HR-managed catalog with point costs, and redemption that snapshots the price at the time it was claimed.

03

Pulse surveys

Short recurring questions with a week label, targeted company-wide or at one department.

04

eNPS

A dedicated survey type with its own prompt, tracked separately from the weekly pulse.

05

Anonymous responses

Anonymity enforced by redacting identity at the read layer, so segmentation still works without exposing anyone.

06

Department segmentation

Results broken down by department, which is where a morale problem is actually visible.

07

Announcements

Company or department-scoped posts, pinned when needed, with per-employee read receipts.

08

Knowledge base

Evergreen categorised articles — policies, benefits, how-tos — searchable rather than emailed.

09

Push notifications

Mobile push and in-app notifications, with realtime updates in the web console.

10

Arabic mobile app

The whole employee surface in Arabic or English, on the phone people already carry.

How it actually works

The mechanism, not the marketing.

To the recipient

Points are credited to the person recognised, not the giver.

It sounds trivial and it is the whole economy. Crediting the giver rewards the act of posting; crediting the recipient rewards the work. Every serious rewards platform runs it the second way, and getting it backwards quietly turns recognition into a popularity feed.

Recorded, redacted

Anonymous surveys still record who answered.

Identity is stored and then redacted when results are read, rather than never captured. That is what makes one-response-per-person enforceable and department-level segmentation possible at all — a table with no identity in it can do neither. The tradeoff is deliberate, and the redaction happens in one place.

stored · userId + surveyId unique → one response per person, enforcedread · identity dropped when the survey is marked anonymousdepartment still attached, so "Line 3 is at 4.0" survives the redaction
Read receipts

You can tell who has actually seen the notice.

Announcements carry per-employee read records, so "we told everyone" is a number rather than an assumption. For safety notices and policy changes on a plant floor, that distinction is the one that matters if something later goes wrong.

Book a demo

Bring us your messiest month.

The fastest way to judge Flume is to run it against a period you already argued about. Send a month of punches and the payroll you produced from it, and we will show you the same month reconciled — including what the anomaly detectors flag.